{"id":96638,"date":"2021-03-23T21:48:02","date_gmt":"2021-03-23T21:48:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/acqua-potabile-e-pesticidi-il-consiglio-federale-dice-no\/"},"modified":"2021-05-25T15:58:16","modified_gmt":"2021-05-25T15:58:16","slug":"drinking-water-and-pesticides-the-federal-council-says-no","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/drinking-water-and-pesticides-the-federal-council-says-no\/","title":{"rendered":"Drinking water and pesticides: the Federal Council says no"},"content":{"rendered":"

Drinking water and pesticides: the Federal Council says no<\/h1>\n

For Bern, two initiatives on the ballot on June 13, 2021, would put jobs, the food bill and food security in Switzerland at risk<\/em><\/h3>\n

On March 23, 2021, the Federal Council outlined its recommendations on the citizens’ initiatives “Clean drinking water and healthy food” and “For a Switzerland without synthetic pesticides”.
\nBoth initiatives would weaken food security and food production in Switzerland, endanger jobs and lead to a transfer of environmental pollution abroad.
\nThe Federal Council therefore rejects both projects. However, it accepts the demands of the initiators of the initiatives with a view to improving the protection of humans and the environment from the negative effects of pesticides and fertilizers.
\nOn June 13, 2021 the Swiss electorate will vote on two popular initiatives.<\/p>\n

Dairy products and agrotourism? Great in Switzerland<\/strong><\/a>
\nApp to cut red tape for Swiss farmers<\/strong><\/a>
\nSwitzerland and six other EU countries together for the Nutri-Score<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

The Nutri-Score initiative calls for farmers to receive direct payments from the federal government only if their farms meet the following conditions: they do not use pesticides, they feed their animals with fodder they have produced themselves and they do not make prophylactic or regular use of antibiotics.
\nThe pesticides initiative aims to completely ban the use of synthetic pesticides in Switzerland. In addition to agriculture, the production and processing of foodstuffs would be greatly affected.
\nOnly foodstuffs produced without the use of synthetic pesticides would be allowed to be imported.
\nThe initiative would also affect the care of the soil and the landscape. The two initiative committees claim that in this way they want to better protect people and the environment from possible negative effects of pesticides.<\/p>\n

\"Una
A multitude of potatoes<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Two threats loom over agriculture<\/h4>\n

The Federal Council rejects both initiatives. The main impact of the drinking water initiative would be on agriculture, food production in Switzerland and related jobs.
\nWithout targeted protection of plants against pests and diseases, domestic food production (e.g. fruit, vegetables or potatoes) would fall sharply.
\nFarmers would no longer be able to produce at an equivalent level and the degree of self-sufficiency would decrease. This would result in an increased need to import foodstuffs from abroad to cover the needs of the Swiss population.<\/p>\n

Switzerland’s booming alpine economy depends on unions<\/strong><\/a>
\nFood in Switzerland: 30 billion turnover<\/strong><\/a>
\nSwitzerland will reduce the environmental impact of its food supply\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

The pesticides initiative also provides for import restrictions. It would only be possible to import foodstuffs produced without the use of synthetic pesticides.
\nThis would greatly limit the choice. Pesticides are also important in food production, where they are used, among other things, to comply with hygiene regulations (e.g. in food storage).
\nA ban on synthetic pesticides would also weaken the export-oriented food industry, as Swiss raw materials such as sugar or vegetable oils would become more expensive. This would put food producers at a disadvantage compared to their foreign competitors.<\/p>\n

\"Una
A multitude of coffee beans<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Government and Parliament are already “on the ball<\/h4>\n

The federal government has already responded to the request of the initiators of the initiative to protect humans and the environment from possible negative effects by taking various targeted measures to reduce the use of pesticides in the agricultural sector.
\nSales of plant protection products have in fact been declining for several years. The Federal Council attaches particular importance to the further tightening of regulations decided by Parliament in the spring session 2021.<\/p>\n

Umfassender Bericht \u00fcber Lebensmittelausgaben im Schweizer Detailhandel<\/a><\/strong>
\nRapport complet sur les d\u00e9penses alimentaires dans le commerce de d\u00e9tail suisse<\/a><\/strong>
\nRapporto completo sulla spese per derrate alimentari nel commercio al dettaglio svizzero<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Both chambers intend to better protect streams, rivers, lakes and drinking water from pesticides.
\nThe conditions for the authorization and application of pesticides will be tightened considerably and groundwater quality will be even better protected.
\nNitrogen and phosphorus surpluses in agriculture will also have to be reduced appropriately in order to reduce the environmental burden. The Federal Council intends to implement these additional measures in cooperation with Parliament.<\/p>\n

\"Il
The cheese, typical of Switzerland, is rarely wasted on the table<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Bern’s view, two initiatives on the ballot on June 13, 2021 would jeopardize jobs as well as the food bill and food security in Switzerland.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":90900,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[256,210,305,257],"tags":[520,265,666,264],"class_list":["post-96638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-economy","category-magazine","category-politics","category-switzerland","tag-health","tag-politics","tag-security","tag-sustainability"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96638"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96638\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":99342,"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96638\/revisions\/99342"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/90900"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/swissfederalism.ch\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}